Ryan v. Los Angeles Ice & Cold Storage Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Clark, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries, and this appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The injury occurred March 20, 1890. Plaintiff was a carpenter by trade, and some two years prior to the accident was employed by the defendant in that capacity alone, but, after the completion of the buildings, he was used in making alterations and repairs when necessary, and as a general laborer, roustabout, or handy man. He was not an engineer, or machinist, or familiar with machinery at the time he entered defendant’s service, nor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Ingerman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Verdelli v. Gray's Harbor Commercial Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Green v. CastronovaOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- Clarke v. Volpa Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Skelton v. Pacific Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.