State v. Rodriguez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Edgar Rodriguez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on (1) proof beyond a reasonable doubt and (2) the element of intent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On June 24, 1993, at approximately 4 p.m., the victim, Jose Rivera, was found shot to death in the front hallway of a two story house on Kossuth Street in Bridgeport. His…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies CollectiveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. LopesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. ErhardtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. FelicianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.