Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 14, 2002No. AC 20764PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The defendant, Waibur Gonzalez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53U-481 and 53a-54a.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of conspiracy to commit murder, (2) the trial court impermissibly bolstered the prosecution’s case and deprived the defendant of a fair trial by making several crucial findings of fact in the charge to the jury, and (3) the court impermissibly denied the defendant the presumption of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. ColletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. CalderonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. ColtherstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. PereiraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. HurdleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API