Legal Opinion
First Southwestern Financial Services v. Pulliam
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 1996No. 16453PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
1. First Southwestern Financial Services (Plaintiff) appeals from an order dismissing its complaint against Harvey and Katherine Pulliam under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 56-10-14 to - 25 (Cum.Supp.1995) (UFTA), to set aside an allegedly fraudulent transfer of property. The trial court found that the limitations statute, Section 56-10-23(A), had fully run before Plaintiff filed its complaint. We affirm.
2. On January 8, 1990, Harvey sold a house to Katherine, who at that time was a single woman. Katherine recorded the deed with the Bernalillo…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Ambassador East Apts., Investors v. Ambassador East InvestmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Eskridge v. NallsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
3Cited by23 opinions
- SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. ZudkewichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Marc H. Nathan v. Stephen WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.