Legal Opinion

Freitag v. McGhie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1997No. 64501-9PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

947 P.2d 1186 (1997)

133 Wash.2d 816

Rommel FREITAG and Bernice Johnson Freitag, Petitioners,

v.

Frank W. McGHIE and Darlene T. McGhie, husband and wife, and Dorothy Lunn, as her separate estate, Respondents.

No. 64501-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 21, 1997.

Decided December 11, 1997.

As Amended December 18, 1997.

Maier & Severance, P.C., by Laurence Severance, Seattle, for Petitioners.

Sinsheimer & Meltzer, Inc. Lois Meltzer, Seattle, David Metcalf, Everett, for Respondents.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This case requires us to interpret the statute of limitations provision for the Uniform…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Vita Food Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Brian Bash v. Textron Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. ZudkewichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Marc H. Nathan v. Stephen WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Fleet National Bank v. Valente (In Re Valente)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API