Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shimola v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. 1994-0610PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 110.] THE STATE EX REL. SHIMOLA V. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Shimola v. Cleveland,

1994-Ohio-243.] Mandamus to compel city of Cleveland to pay the principal amounts of three 1990 judgments entered against the city and accrued statutory postjudgment interest—Writ granted, when. (No. 94-610—Submitted June 29, 1994—Decided August 24, 1994.) In Mandamus. __________________ {¶ 1} On August 17, 1981, relator, Charles D. Shimola, brought a civil action against respondent city of Cleveland for damages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Spirko v. Judges of the Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Shimola v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Estate of Miles v. Village of PiketonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Zimmerman v. BoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API