Legal Opinion
In Re Peeler
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1968No. Crim. 4969PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Petitioner had been granted probation after a plea of guilty on a charge of possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530). Thereafter she requested modification of the conditions of probation. The basis of her petition was that she had married one James Peeler after her plea but before sentence and that certain conditions of the probation were inimical to her status as a married woman. The petition was heard and resulted in a modification of probation by the imposition of conditions more stringent than those originally imposed.
Petitioner filed with this court a petition for habeas…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. CooksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re ManninoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. O'NEILCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. HacklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. JungersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.