In Re Mannino
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
By his petition for habeas corpus the petitioner seeks a judgment declaring that certain conditions upon which he was granted probation are void, and releasing him from all custody and obligations under those conditions.1 He contends (1) that the state may not grant the privilege *957of probation on conditions requiring the relinquishment of First Amendment rights, (2) that the complained of conditions of probation are an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech, (3) that those conditions are unreasonable and excessive in the light of California probation law, and (4) that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess AnneSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re LewallenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.