Legal Opinion

People v. Hackler

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1993No. F014589PublishedCited by 25 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

In the published portion of this opinion we hold that a condition of probation was unreasonably overbroad and invalid. The condition required the appellant, convicted of shoplifting beer from a supermarket, to wear an outer garment bearing a bold, printed statement of his status as a felony theft probationer. The requirement applied whenever the probationer was outside his actual living quarters. In the unpublished portion of the opinion we further hold that the trial court deprived appellant of his due process right to written notice that he was charged with having violated…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. United States v. A-Abras Inc., Osip TaskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. O'NEILCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API