Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. O'NEIL

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 2008No. A117078PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

Defendant Ryan Anthony O’Neil, convicted on a plea of guilty to the possession for sale of illegal narcotics, challenges the validity of a condition of his probation forbidding him from associating with persons designated by his probation officer. We agree that as stated the condition is too broad, but the defect can be corrected by the inclusion of more precise language.

Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant was charged by information with four felony counts: possession of psilocybin mushrooms for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), possession of LSD for sale (ibid.),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. UrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Simon v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. People v. LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. BrandãoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API