Legal Opinion

Davis v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1940No. 29119PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, C. J.

Hazel Lewis filed an action in the district court of Pontotoc county against Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Company, a corporation, to enforce the payment to her of certain proceeds from the sale of oil and gas from a certain -lease in that county. Muriel Kittell asked and was granted permission to intervene as a claimant of the fund sought by Lewis. Under the issues made by the pleadings, the company became a stakeholder, and the controversy is between Lewis and Kit-tell.

September 9, 1933, Chism acquired leases on certain land in Pontotoc county. November 20, 1933, Chism assigned said leases…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Zelma Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Cuff v. KosloskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. King v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Clark v. Armstrong MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Tupeker v. DeanerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  3. Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Davidson Oil Country Supply Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Eqpt. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Lowden v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API