Legal Opinion

Tupeker v. Deaner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1915No. 4292PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Ered W. Tupeker and another against John J. Deaner. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

BLEAKMOBE, O.

This is an action commenced in the district court of Okmulgee county by the plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs against defendant in error 'as defendant, to recover money paid for an assignment of an oil and gas lease, and for damages. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The case was tried to the court, which rendered judgment for defendant.

The facts, disclosed by the evidence, essential to a determination of the question here, are that in July, 1908, a guardian, under proper orders of the county court of McIntosh county, Okla., executed an oil and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Clevenger v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Gould v. BourgeoisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. The Texas Company v. PetittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. State v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Davis v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API