Legal Opinion
Mackie v. Hull
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 7, 2002No. AC 21615PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendants, Richard A. Hull and Catherine A. Hull, appeal from the judgment of the trial court which settled the northerly boundary of their land and permanently enjoined them from entering on or in any way interfering with the plaintiffs’ neighboring land to the north. The defendants challenge the trial court’s findings (1) that the plaintiffs, Randal D. Mackie and Joanna Mackie, have as the southerly boundary of their plot of land in Morris the southerly line of an “abandoned highway” and (2) that the defendants have no interest in any portion of the plaintiffs’ land,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. RyanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Andersen Consulting, LLP v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Barri v. Schwarz Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Frank Towers Corp. v. LavianaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Pierce v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Lisiewski v. SeidelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Torgerson v. Sarah Tuxis Residential Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cornfield Point Ass'n v. Town of Old SaybrookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.