In the Matter of Rushton

This attorney disciplinary matter is before the Court as a result of a report and recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. We agree that the Respondent, Edward W. Rushton, Jr., is guilty of misconduct. We are not in agreement with the recommended sanction. The ultimate responsibility of determining sanctions is in this Court. Burns v. Clayton, 237 S. C. 316, 117 S. E. (2d) 300 (1960).

The complaint, which alleged two counts of misconduct, first charged that the Respondent appeared in his office in an intoxicated condition while conferring with clients.…