Legal Opinion

Mepham v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1986No. L.A. 32217PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner Charles Henry Mepham be suspended from the practice of law for five years, that the order of suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on probation for five years on specified conditions including three years’ actual suspension.

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in 1953. In 1977 he was privately reproved for failing to communicate with and abandoning a client and refusing to return unearned fees. In 1978 he was publicly reproved for similar conduct.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Spindell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Martin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hawk v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Frazer v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API