Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 15, 2008No. 429, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellant, Troy C. Hudson (“Hudson”), appeals from final judgments that were entered in the Superior Court. A jury found Hudson guilty of Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony, Possession with Intent to Deliver Cocaine, Possession of a Deadly Weapon by a Person Prohibited, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, and Resisting Arrest. In this direct appeal, Hudson raises three claims. First, the trial judge erred by allowing the chief investigating officer to testify both as a fact ■witness and as an expert witness. Second, even assuming that a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  4. Outten v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  2. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
  5. State v. HerbertSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API