Legal Opinion
ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 25, 2011No. Civ. No. 10-050-SLRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs ArcelorMittal France and ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine (collectively “plaintiffs”) brought suit against defendants AK Steel Corporation (“AK Steel”), Severstal Dearborn, Inc. (“Severstal”), and Wheeling Nisshin, Inc. (“Wheeling”) (collectively “defendants”), alleging infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,296,8051 (“the '805 patent”). *964(D.I. 1) The parties agreed to forego summary judgment practice in favor of an expedited trial (D.I. 68) which took place from January 11-14, 2011. At the end of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mobilemedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Solvay, S.A. v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.