Legal Opinion
Ashley v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 15, 2010No. 329, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice.
James Ashley (“Ashley”), the defendant below, appeals from a Superior Court final judgment of conviction. A jury found Ashley guilty of Possession with Intent to Deliver Heroin. 1 On appeal, Ashley claims that the Superior Court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence that Ashley intended to sell heroin was legally insufficient. We find no error and affirm.
FACTS
On July 19, 2008, Officer John Iglio (‘Ig-lio”) of the Middletown Police “pulled over” a car, which Ashley was driving erratically. Iglio approached the car, told Ashley that he had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cline v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- General Motors Corp. v. GrenierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNair v. Warden MayDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- XL Insurance America, Inc. v. Noranda Aluminum Holding CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020