Outten v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
In this appeal, the Appellant/Defendant-below, Jack Foster Outten, Jr. (“Outten”) challenges the December 22, 1997 opinion of the Superior Court denying his amended motion for postconviction relief. Outten claims that the Superior Court erred in rejecting the merits of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in both the guilt and penalty phases of his trial. Outten also complains of the failure of the Superior Court to afford him an evidentiary hearing on his postconviction claim. We find no error in the Superior Court’s decision and, accordingly, affirm.
I
Outten and his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Shelton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Jack Foster Outten, Jr. v. Rick Kearney, Warden, Sussex Correctional Institute Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Jack F. Outten, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.