Legal Opinion

Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 2008No. CV-07-0057-PRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to decide whether Arizona’s Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Act (UMA), Ariz.Rev.Stat. (A.R.S.) § 20-259.01 (2002 & Supp.2007), permits an insurer to reduce Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverage by the amount of workers’ compensation benefits an insured receives. See A.R.S. § 20-259.01.G (defining UIM coverage). For the reasons that follow, we hold that the UMA’s definition of UIM coverage precludes an insurer from reducing such coverage based on the insured’s receipt of workers’ compensation benefits.

I

¶ 2 In 1997, a vehicle struck Pima…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. SharpArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Beaver v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API