Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Gilmore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1991No. CV-90-0193-PRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

The court of appeals held that a comprehensive general liability insurance policy, which also provided automobile liability coverage by specific endorsement, was exempt from the requirements of A.R.S. § 20-259.01, the Uninsured Motorist Act. See St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Gilmore, 165 Ariz. 113, 796 P.2d 915 (Ct. App.1990). Because the question is one of first impression in our courts, we granted review. Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

This is yet another case in which…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. The Employers Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Selander v. Erie Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ormsbee v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API