Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1999No. 21220PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The defendant-appellant Kenneth S.G. Lee, acting pro se, appeals from his convic tion of and sentence for one count of operation without no-fault insurance, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statues (HRS) § 431:10C-104 (1993 & Supp.1996). 1 On appeal, he argues that the district court erred because: (1) there was insufficient evidence adduced that (a) the vehicle was uninsured, (b) Lee was the owner of the vehicle, and (c) Lee possessed the requisite state of mind at the time of the alleged violation; (2) it failed to comply with the procedural requirements of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. StockerHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. KlingeHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. StaleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API