Legal Opinion

State v. Furutani

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 15557PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINSON, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant State of Hawaii (hereafter State or prosecution) appeals the August 7, 1991 findings of fact (FOFs), conclusions of law (COLs), and order of the Fifth Circuit Court (circuit court) granting the defendant-appellee Henry H. Furutani’s motion for new trial pursuant to Rule 33 of the Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP). 1

The State urges that the circuit court committed the following reversible errors in granting Furutani’s motion for new trial: (1) finding that defense counsel had obtained an express affirmative commitment from the jurors — by way of a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WallaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HolbronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API