Legal Opinion

State v. Stocker

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1999No. 21277PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The defendant-appellant Kent D. Stocker appeals from his guilty conviction of, and sentence for, one count of harassment, in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 711-1106(l)(a) (Supp.1998). 1 On appeal, Stocker argues that insufficient evidence was adduced to prove that: (1) he committed harassment, pursuant to HRS § 711-1106(l)(a); and (2) his actipns were not justified by the parental discipline defense, pursuant to HRS § 703-309(1) (1993). 2 We agree with Stocker that the prosecution failed to adduce sufficient evidence to rebut his justification…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. DudoitHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. RauchHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API