Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Roxas v. Marcos

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1998No. 20606PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevinson, J.

The defendant-appellant/eross-appellee Imelda Marcos (Imelda), in her alleged capacity as personal representative of the Estate (the Marcos Estate) of former Philippine President Ferdinand E. Marcos (Ferdinand), appeals from that portion of the amended judgment of the first circuit court entered in favor of the plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appel-lants the Estate of Rogelio (aka Roger) Domingo Roxas (the Roxas Estate) and the Golden Budha Corporation (GBC) (collectively, the plaintiffs-appellees) and against the Marcos Estate. The plaintiffs-appellees cross-appeal from: (1) that portion of the…

2Cases cited172 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Republic of Philippines v. PimentelSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API