Legal Opinion

Scannell v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1996No. 63202-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

— This case involves Petitioner John Scannell’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal in conformance with a recently amended Rule of Appellate Procedure. The Court of Appeals refused to grant Scannell’s motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Scannell sought review from this court, but the Commissioner denied Scannell’s motion. Scannell then filed a motion to modify the Commissioner. Department One of this court has considered Scannell’s motion to modify, and we now modify the Commissioner’s ruling and remand the *831case to the Court of Appeals with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AshbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Myers v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Reichelt v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shumway v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Scannell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hanks v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Kitsap County Fire Protection District No. 7 v. Kitsap County Boundary Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Lewis County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API