Legal Opinion
Reichelt v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 28, 1988No. 22088-8-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
Raymark Industries, Inc., defendant below, seeks an extension of time to file a notice of appeal.
In 1980, Lois and Edward Reichelt sued 28 asbestos manufacturers and distributors, including Raymark, for personal injuries suffered by Edward and for loss of consortium suffered by Lois, his wife. Their case was dismissed as untimely because Reichelt had known of the hazards of asbestos since 1957 and became aware that he had asbestosis in 1971. This court affirmed the dismissal. Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp., 42 Wn. App. 620, 712 P.2d 881 (1986).
The Supreme Court affirmed this court's opinion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Weeks v. Chief of Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. AshbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Structurals Northwest, Ltd. v. Fifth & Park Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shumway v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Pybas v. PaolinoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Hoirup v. Empire Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Beckman v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Scannell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.