Legal Opinion
Scannell v. State
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1996No. 63202-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
912 P.2d 489 (1996)
128 Wash.2d 829
John SCANNELL, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Washington, Office of Administrative Hearings, James B. Stanford, City of Seattle, Virginia Anderson, Len Bois, Terry McLaughlin, John Cunningham, Mylor Treneer, and Elaine Harrison, Respondents.
No. 63202-2.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
March 14, 1996.
John Scannell, Renton, pro se.
Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, Jeffrey Even, Asst., Olympia, Mark Sidran, Seattle City Attorney, Mary K. Doherty, Asst., Seattle, for respondents.
2Per curiam
This case involves Petitioner John Scannell's failure to file a timely notice…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. AshbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Myers v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Reichelt v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Scannell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
4Cited by11 opinions
- Shumway v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Hanks v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Kitsap County Fire Protection District No. 7 v. Kitsap County Boundary Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Lewis County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Lewis County v. W. WA. GMHBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.