Legal Opinion

Longmaid v. Coulter

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1898No. S. F. No. 848PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County and from an order denying a new trial. E. M.Angellotti, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Upon the trial of this case in the superior court the trial judge rendered the following opinion:

“The defendants are husband and wife, and have been such ever since November 3, 1891. The default of the defendant William has been entered, and the cause was tried upon the amended complaint, and the answer of defendant Harriet A, Coulter thereto. There is no dispute as to the facts, which are substantially as follows:
“The plaintiff was on the fifth day of November, 1890, the owner of and possessed of a lot of land in Sausalito, known as lot 46, in block A. On that day he entered into a verbal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Micou v. AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Avery v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Estate of ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Panagopulos v. Manning Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API