Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Court Lacks Jurisdiction over Claims by Federally Recognized Indian Tribe for Denial of Effective Redress in Federal Courts; Amendment of Pleadings; Judicial Takings Claim Fails to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted
OPINION
HEWITT, Chief Judge
The Shinnecock Indian Nation (the Shinne-cock Nation or plaintiff), is a federally recognized Indian tribe whose historical territory included the area that is now the town of Southampton, New York. Compl., Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1, ¶¶9, ll. 1 In this action, plaintiff asserts that the United States (the government or defendant), acting…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Two Shields v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015