Legal Opinion

Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 29, 2013No. 12-836LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Court Lacks Jurisdiction over Claims by Federally Recognized Indian Tribe for Denial of Effective Redress in Federal Courts; Amendment of Pleadings; Judicial Takings Claim Fails to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted

OPINION

HEWITT, Chief Judge

The Shinnecock Indian Nation (the Shinne-cock Nation or plaintiff), is a federally recognized Indian tribe whose historical territory included the area that is now the town of Southampton, New York. Compl., Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1, ¶¶9, ll. 1 In this action, plaintiff asserts that the United States (the government or defendant), acting…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Two Shields v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API