Legal Opinion

Two Shields v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 6, 2015No. 13-90 LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Cobell v. Norton; Class Action Suit; Fiduciary Duty; Indian Tucker Act

OPINION and ORDER

Block, Judge.

This case is one of the myriad of breach of trust claims brought by Native Americans against various federal agencies. 1 Paradoxically, the parties present very little in common. Like the proverbial two ships passing in the night, 2 plaintiffs and defendant here present the court with two competing narratives that raise entirely different legal issues.

Plaintiffs 3 Ramona Two Shields and Mary Louise Defender Wilson claim that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”)…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramona Two Shields v. Spencer Wilkinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Castillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API