Legal Opinion

Neesley v. Lord

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1941No. Docket No. 34, Calendar No. 41,368PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

About 6 p.m. on May 19, 1939, plaintiff, a middle-aged woman, was walking toward the west on the south side of West Grand boulevard in the city of Detroit. Third avenue runs north and south and was used at that time for traffic in each direction. While attempting to cross Third avenue, plaintiff was struck by defendant’s car. She suffered serious injuries for which the jury in the lower court awarded her $3,500. The court granted a motion to set aside the jury’s verdict and entered a judgment non obstante veredicto , for defendant. The main question presented on appeal is whether plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Goonen v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Abbott v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Benjamin v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Burton v. Yellow & Checker Cab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alley v. KlotzMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Miller v. PillowMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Boyd v. MaruskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wilson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Cooch EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API