Legal Opinion

Weile v. Sturtevant

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1917No. S. F. No. 8383PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of San Francisco. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is a proceeding for a writ of mandate. J. M. Brown, Inc., a corporation, had recovered a judgment in the superior court in San Francisco against W. P. Fuller & Co. Thereafter, on appeal, the judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. Subsequently J. M. Brown, Inc., having been adjudicated a bankrupt, the trustee sold the chose in action which the bankrupt had against W. P. Fuller & Co. to the petitioner, who then had the cause set for a retrial in the court below in the department presided over by the respondent. Before the day set for the retrial W..P. Fuller & Co. filed its bill of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Henderson v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. Ex Parte KarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Felt v. AmidonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Erlich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Supera v. Moreland Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API