Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Stansbury
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1923No. Civ. No. 4070PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
In the year 1911 Charles Stansbury and John Balch entered into a partnership agreement for the purpose of carrying on a contracting and paving business. That business continued until August 28, 1915, when it was terminated. Stansbury then gave to Balch a written memorandum reading as follows: “This memorandum certifies that the undersigned, Chas. Stansbury and J. Balch, both of Los Angeles, Calif, have this day above mentioned, viz., Aug. 28th, 1915, cheeked up the accounts and transactions affecting the contracts known as the St. Louis—Santa Cruz —’Section Three—and Fifth Street of San Pedro…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chappedelaine v. DechenauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Branger & Driard v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Carpenter v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Clarke v. KelseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Milling Corp. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- First National Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Zenos v. HardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933