Legal Opinion
Meserve v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1934No. Civ. 9807; Civ. 9808PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.
October 3, 1929, petitioner Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Company (hereinafter called cleaning company) recovered a judgment in the Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County against respondent Hollywood Laundry Service, Incorporated (hereinafter called laundry company) for the sum of $43,865 as damages for the alleged breach of a contract made and entered into by said corporation. The cleaning company was represented in said action by petitioner Meserve, Mumper, Hughes & Robertson and one Harry W. Hanson, since deceased (hereinafter called attorneys). Said judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Johnson v. DahlquistWashington Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Everts v. Will S. Fawcett Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Denham v. Farmers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Baker v. TullockMontana Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.