Legal Opinion

Russell v. Cavelero

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1926No. 19661. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action the respondent, Russell, sought to recover against the appellants, Cavelero-, for personal injuries. The respondent, at the time of receiving the injuries, was in the employ of the appellants as a farm hand. He was working in the haymow of the appellants’ barn, mowing hay brought therein by a derrick fork. The hay-mow was of considerable size, and near its center was a perpendicular chute, made of lumber, three and one-half by four feet in size, extending from near the lower floor of the barn upwards through the floor of the hay-mow to a height of about thirteen feet above the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. ManvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Callihan v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Conover v. Neher-Ross Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. BraniffWashington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. AlanizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sweazey v. Valley Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. GauseArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API