Legal Opinion

Sweazey v. Valley Transport, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1940No. 27751PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by Ralph S. Sweazey, administrator of the estate of R. Lawrence Faye Sweazey and Laura Finck Sweazey, deceased, to recover damages against the defendants, Valley Transport, Inc., and Faye Sparger, for the alleged wrongful death of Lawrence Sweazey and Laura Sweazey, husband and wife. The action was brought for and on behalf of, and for the benefit of, the three minor children of Mr. and Mrs. Sweazey, namely: Margaret Joanne Sweazey, age five years; Elizabeth Anne Sweazey, age seven years; and Maxine Louise Sweazey, age nine years; and for and on behalf of the estate…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Chicago City Railway Co. v. MatthiesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hutton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API