Legal Opinion

Schiffman v. Atlas Mill Supply Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1961No. Civ. 25212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff, executor of the estate of Bertha Sehiffman, deceased, filed suit on a $4,000 promissory note executed October 31,1955, by defendant corporation to Bertha. Defendant admitted execution and delivery of the note, receipt of the money, and that it was never repaid; but asserted, and the trial court so found, that Bertha’s conduct on or about January 27, 1956, and thereafter prior to her death, “amounted to an executed oral agreement that the debt and obligation was forgiven, and deemed paid and satisfied.” (Findings of Fact, p. 6.) Judgment was entered in favor of defendant; plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fox Chicago Realty Corp. v. Zukor's Dresses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Fox v. EhrmantrautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hill & Morton, Inc. v. CoughlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API