Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fox v. Ehrmantraut

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1980No. S.F. 24107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Defendant and cross-complainant, Dr. Harry C. Ehrmantraut, appeals from judgment for plaintiff and cross-defendant, Theo L. Fox, in this action to recover on a promissory note and a cross-action for misrepresentation, fraud, breach of contract, and rescission. We affirm.

In July 1974, Fox, a businessman and investor, agreed to purchase M. A. Baker and Associates, a company engaged in the search for and placement of business executives in the San Jose area. M. A. Baker and Associates was licensed under agreement with Executive Search Associates, Inc., to use certain techniques…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Silver Hills Country Club v. SobieskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. All Points Traders, Inc. v. Barrington AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. SchockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. CosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Oak Industries, Inc. v. Foxboro Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API