Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Government Employees Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1984No. F003048PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAMLIN, J.

Plaintiffs, George J. Gibson and Loriene Gibson, appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint against defendant, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), for breach of fiduciary duty in failing to inform plaintiffs of the availability and potential need for “under-insured motorist” coverage, as well as the inadequacy of plaintiffs’ $3,000 medical payments benefit. Plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed after defendant’s general demurrer was sustained and plaintiffs failed to file a timely amendment to their complaint.

This appeal requires us to decide whether an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Doctors' Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Racine & Laramie, Ltd. v. Department of Parks & RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Vu v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Nelson v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API