Turman v. Ellison
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The case has been exhaustively argued, although no novel proposition of law is involved. Indeed, the legal principles so ably discussed by counsel have been frequently considered by eminent jurists throughout the country and it would be idle to attempt in this opinion to add to the learning upon the subject. It is doubtful even if any specific statement of the facts can be of any value to the profession, and we might content ourselves with the declaration that the findings of the court are supported, and therefore the judgment must be affirmed.
However, it may not be amiss to call attention to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re Estate of TooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Austin v. WilcoxsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by15 opinions
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- McDonald v. LambertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Henderson v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Rench v. McMullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.