Legal Opinion

Paley v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1955No. Civ. 21272PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

This case involves certain aspects of the problem of the extent of survival after death of a testator’s privilege against disclosure by his attorney of confidential communications made by the testator in connection with the preparation and execution of his will. Petitioner Jacob Paley seeks a writ of mandate directing the superior court to require his deceased wife’s attorney, Stanley E. Fox, Esq., to answer certain questions upon deposition which the trial court held objectionable as calling for privileged matter, for that reason sustaining objections to said questions.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Glover v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re Estate of DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. United Steelworkers of America v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Estate of HelfmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. County of Fresno v. Superior Court of Fresno Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API