Nayor v. Rent Board of Brookline
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The town of Brookline accepted St. 1953, c. 434, entitled “An Act relative to rent control,” an emergency law permitting local rent control in succession to that of the United States (§ 14). The vote of acceptance by a town meeting was required to “include a declaration that a substantial shortage of rental housing accommodations exists in such . . . town and that the control of rents therein is necessary in the public interest” (§ 12).
This is a complaint in a District Court brought under § 6 (a) by a tenant of an apartment, which was “controlled housing accommodations” (§ 2 [b]), against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Pittsley v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Wilson v. HeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Russell v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Finnegan v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- City of Miami Beach v. Forte Towers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Marshal House v. RENT REVIEW & GRIEVANCE BD, BROOKLINEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Altschuler v. Boston Rent BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Bouchard v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.