Legal Opinion
Russell v. Treasurer & Receiver General
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 16, 1954PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This is a petition by twenty-five taxable inhabitants of the Commonwealth to restrain the Commonwealth from expending money to reimburse the cities and towns, which have accepted St. 1953, c. 434, forty per cent of the amounts which they have expended for the purposes of this act. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 29, § 63, inserted by St. 1937, c. 157.
The respondents are the Treasurer and Receiver General, the temporary State housing rent coordinator, and the comptroller. All respondents have appeared and answered by the Attorney General. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 12, § 3. There is a statement of agreed facts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- City of Miami Beach v. Forte Towers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Grace v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.