Legal Opinion

Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of Brookline

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 10, 1971PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

These four cases consolidated for appeal bring to us questions arising out of two recently enacted Massachusetts rent control statutes. The constitutionality of these statutes is under attack in three principal suits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. In all three the existence of an actual controversy is admitted by the principal parties.

Marshal House, Inc. (Marshal House) seeks a binding determination against the town of Brookline, its board of selectmen, and its rent control board that St. 1970, c. 842, is unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs in the suit of Anna L. Aiello and another…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Dodd v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API