Legal Opinion

Pittsley v. David

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1937PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

Both parties allege exceptions in an action of tort for personal injuries sustained on May 21, 1933, by the plaintiff’s intestate, a married woman, while a guest in an automobile owned by the defendant’s testator and driven by one Pittsley, who was the servant of the defendant’s . testator, acting within the scope of his employment, as well as the husband of the plaintiff’s intestate. With reference to the occurrences of May 21, 1933, the plaintiff’s intestate and the defendant’s testator will be called respectively the plaintiff and the defendant.

1. On December 3, 1936, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Marquis v. MessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Carleton v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. New England Trust Co. v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API