People v. Hilderbrandt

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Harris, J.

In People v Bartolomeo (53 NY2d 225, 229), the Court of Appeals held: “Where to the knowledge of the interrogating officer a suspect being questioned had been arrested by the same law enforcement agency nine days previously on an unrelated charge, statements obtained in consequence of the interrogation must be suppressed if in fact the suspect is represented by an attorney with respect to the unrelated charge even though the fact of such representation is unknown to the officer.”

However, in footnote 1 the court stated the following caveat: “We intimate no…