People v. Bartolomeo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
Where to the knowledge of the interrogating officer a suspect being questioned had been arrested by the same law enforcement agency nine days previously on an unrelated charge, statements obtained in consequence of the interrogation must be suppressed if in fact the suspect is represented by an attorney with respect to the unrelated charge even though the fact of such representation is unknown to the officer. In such circumstances defendant cannot effectively waive his right to counsel unless the attorney is present.1 There need not be suppression, however, of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by291 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. KinchenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BeamNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.