Legal Opinion

People v. Cunningham

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1980PublishedCited by 247 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

We hold that once a suspect in custody requests the assistance of counsel, he may not be questioned further in the absence of an attorney. We intend by our holding to make it clear that an uncounseled waiver of a constitutional right will not be deemed voluntary if it is made after the right to counsel has been invoked.

Defendant Frederick Cunningham was tried and convicted of murder in the second degree as a result of his alleged participation in a gas station robbery in which a service attendant was shot to death. One of the most damaging pieces of evidence offered…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by247 opinions

  1. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. BeamNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API