Legal Opinion

United States v. Niolu

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 19, 1954No. 1040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

The initial conviction of this accused was set aside by the convening authority who directed a rehearing. The record of trial on that rehearing was considered on appeal by this Court, following affirming action by intermediate reviewing authorities. At that time we reversed and remanded because of inadequacies in the law officer’s instructions. United States v. Niolu, 2 USCMA 513, 10 CMR 11. A. second rehearing that is, a third trial was then held, and the instant conviction ensued. This, in turn, was set aside by a board of review in the office of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CambridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. PadillaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. ZimmermanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. McNeillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. AauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. AkerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. NastroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API